12 Angry Men

English 514                                                                        Adam Moss Twelve angry Men In nock to prove the doubt of a murder, of course at that place testa workforcet sire to be overmuch than one point. In the play Twelve Angry men I had my doubts believing this sons aversion for the next three chief(prenominal) reasons that jury macrocosm 8 has bring about turn out. In this play there was many testimonies, none supplied more than evidence towards the kids guilt than the sure-enough(prenominal) mans. The previous(a) man swore below cursing that he had hear the boy scream Im gonna putting to last you , whence he heard the body fall. He ran to the launching just in blame to expect the boy scampering get the hang the stairs. Juror 8 then cuts down the experient mans testimonial. The jurywoman than points out that the old man is actually really old and need the help of 2 canes to walk. Who walks with a pair of canes to bring out down to thew front doorway in 15 seconds. In worldly concern theirs no way that he could have got there that fast. 39 seconds, 39 . He also claims that he heard the boy telephone call and the body fall hardly we also adjust out the el channelise come uped at the same time of the murder.

Does this not prevent one from hearing anything else but the train? An el train takes ten seconds to pass a current point, that el train had to be breathing out by the old mans windowpane for at least sextet seconds, Its not mathematical that he could have heard it. He also stated that he saw the boy hurry down the he could see the boy due to the shocking lighting in the building. The guard were using flashlights . The old mans testimony was useless and not... If you requisite to get a full essay, sight it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.