New York Times' Coverage in 1935: Marking in History

At the same time, the difficulties in Europe were becoming more pronounced as the Fascists in Italy and Germany were raising armies and rattling sabers. Even more ominous were the efforts undertaken by Hitler to address what he called the 'Jewish problem," such as by develop laws to address the matter ("Hitler Due to List unseasoned Laws on Jews" 12). This was a clear concern to the Jewish community in the United States ("Jewish Veterans Ask Olympics Ban" 12). Symbolic acts in the U.S. were also looked upon as provocative but were also protected, as we would do today ("Nazi Flag Flies at Festival Here" 12).

The vogue the developing storm in Europe was treated by the newspaper was non contrasted recent treatment of the Bosnia issue, for the people apparently saw these issues as terrible but non as something that threatened them directly. in that respect were many reports such as the one on folk 22 regarding the way the Nazis were interpreting their laws on Jews to determine what rights Jews had and what rights they did not have ("Hope of Reich Jews Is Dimmed by Events" 6). The letters pages in the paper were remarkably free of much attention to the events victorious place in Nazi Germany, and instead issues of taxation and presidency spending predominated, such as one letter that complained approximately people who suggested government spending as a way of promoting the national welfare ("Public Spending" 22). By mid-October,

We are accustomed to the use of surveys and poll to tell us what we as a people mobilise ab turn up various issues, candidates, and ideas. This approach was not as genuine in the 1930s, but the overbold York measure did send reporters out to find out what people thought more or less a round of issues of the time. They found that the details of the New Deal were not of particular concern to the people in spite of the problems that the New Deal was meant to address. The reporters traveled across the Midwest to find out what troubled people, and what they found was that people were largely troubled by their own problems.

Farmers and businessmen were not sentiment much about the New Deal or the war but were thinking about ways of growing better crops, about the issue of new factories on the young, about the state of the economy and its authorisation for improvement, and so on ("Inquiry into What People atomic number 18 persuasion" 11).

"Wholesale Round-Up Renewed by Police; Midtown Center of fifth Drive This Year." The New York quantify (September 4, 1935), 1.

"Inquiry into What People Are Thinking." The New York Times (September 8, 1935), 11.

"27 Arrested as Usurers in fast Move by Dewey to Break Up Vast Racket." The New York Times (October 29, 1935), 1.

"'Breathing spell' Is Here; Social Program Complete." The New York Times (September 7, 1935), 1.

"Schultz Dies of Wounds without Naming Slayers; 3 Aides Dead, One Dying." The New York Times (October 25, 1935), 1.

The concerns of the people in New York City tended to center on local issues. Crime was being fought in a number of ways, including police sweeps in Manhattan under the new Public confrontation Act ("Wholesale Round-Up Renewed by Police' Midtown Centre of twenty percent Drive This year" 1). Another concern was noise abatement, and a number of sources for noise were being opposed by the city government or by local groups, such as the use of loudspeakers and political trucks promoting candidates from neighborhood to neighborhood ("12,
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.